Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Culver v. Levi

Supreme Court of North Dakota

February 12, 2015

Corey Culver, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
Grant Levi, Director of the North Dakota Department of Transportation, Respondent and Appellee

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable William A. Herauf, Judge.

Thomas F. Murtha IV, P.O. Box 1111, Dickinson, N.D. 58602-1111, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.

Michael T. Pitcher, Office of Attorney General, 500 North 9th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for respondent and appellee; on brief.

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J., Dale V. Sandstrom, Daniel J. Crothers, Lisa Fair McEvers, Carol Ronning Kapsner.

OPINION

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Corey Culver appeals from a judgment affirming a decision of the Department of Transportation to suspend his driving privileges for 91 days. Culver argues he was coerced into giving consent to the breath tests by the law enforcement officer's reading of the implied consent advisory. We have rejected this argument in State v. Smith, 2014 ND 152, 849 N.W.2d 599, and McCoy v. North Dakota Dep't of Transp., 2014 ND 119, 848 N.W.2d 659. Culver's argument that the implied consent laws violate the Fourth Amendment and N.D. Const. art. I, § 8, was rejected in State v. Birchfield, 2015 ND 6, 858 N.W.2d 302. Culver's argument that the implied consent laws violate the unconstitutional conditions doctrine was rejected in Beylund v. Levi, 2015 ND 18, 859 N.W.2d 403. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J., Dale V. Sandstrom, Daniel J. Crothers, Lisa Fair McEvers, Carol ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.