Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Frith v. North Dakota Workforce Safety and Insurance

Supreme Court of North Dakota

May 2, 2014

Roger Frith, Appellant
v.
North Dakota Workforce Safety and Insurance, Appellee and DMI Industries, Inc., Respondent

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable John C. Irby, Judge.

Roger Frith, self-represented, Fargo, N.D., appellant.

Jacqueline S. Anderson, Fargo, N.D., for appellee.

Dale V. Sandstrom, Daniel J. Crothers, Carol Ronning Kapsner, Everett Nels Olson, S.J., Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Opinion of the Court bye Sandstrom, Justice. The Honorable Everett Nels Olson, Surrogate Judge, sitting in place of McEvers, J., disqualified.

OPINION

Page 893

Sandstrom, Justice.

[¶1] Roger Frith appeals from a district court judgment affirming an order of

Page 894

Workforce Safety and Insurance ("WSI" ) denying him medical benefits. We affirm, concluding a reasoning mind could have reasonably concluded Frith failed to show his work activities substantially accelerated the progression or substantially worsened the severity of a preexisting condition.

I

[¶2] In September 2010, Frith filed a claim for a work injury with WSI. He alleged that on August 18th or 19th he hurt his back at work while lifting and moving a large desk backwards up some stairs. Frith was working for DMI Industries. In June 2011, WSI denied Frith's claim for benefits, concluding he had not proven that his condition was causally related to a work injury or that his work activities substantially accelerated the progression or substantially worsened the severity of his preexisting spine condition. WSI found the medical records reflected a pre-existing condition which exhibited symptoms well before Frith alleged he injured his back at work.

[¶3] Frith requested a hearing. Greg Peterson, M.D., a physician specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation, testified at the hearing that Frith's disk bulge in his spine in 2009 and 2010 was the manifestation of a degenerative condition. Dr. Peterson testified he did not believe Frith's preexisting condition was caused by work. In answering why he concluded Frith's preexisting condition was not substantially accelerated or worsened by Frith's work injury and general work at DMI, Dr. Peterson testified that, among other things, there is evidence Frith had substantial back pain radiating into his right hip and leg prior to beginning work at DMI.

[¶4] According to medical records, in March 2007 Frith went to the emergency room complaining of back pain. Troy Schaff, M.D., reported, " [Frith] states approximately a month ago after doing some heavy lifting, moving carpeting rolls, he had the onset of pain in his lower back. [Frith] states that 2 days later he slipped and fell on some ice, landing primarily on his left lower mid back region. . . . He states that he has had persistent pain since that time." Dr. Schaff noted Frith had x-rays of his lower spine, which showed good alignment without evidence of fracture, dislocation, or other acute-appearing abnormality. After a few sessions of physical therapy, Frith's physical therapist stated that Frith reported his pain was much improved and that he had only mild intermittent pain. The record shows Frith began working at DMI Industries a few months later, around July 2007.

[¶5] After an annual exam in January 2009, Eunah Fischer, M.D., reported Frith has had " intermittent low back pain, not as severe as back in 2005, but [occasionally associated] with numbness in left lower leg." An MRI was completed on February 1, 2009. Jason Asheim, M.D., stated, " There is mild degenerative disc and facet disease. Findings are most significant at L4-L5 where a small . . . disc protrusion is abutting the . . . L5 nerve root in the lateral recess[.]" Dr. Fischer wrote a letter to Frith explaining that the MRI revealed he has " minor arthritis in all of [his] lumbar discs, and it is most noticeable at the L4-L5 level. At this level, the disc is protruding slightly, however there is no significant disc herniation."

[¶6] On August 13, 2010, Frith saw Dr. Fischer again for questions regarding his " chronic low back pain." Dr. Fischer reported, " [Frith] is frustrated that he

Page 895

never feels completely well. More recently, he feels that he's had an exacerbation of his symptoms in his right lower extremity." Another MRI was performed on August 17, 2010. Steven Mitchell, M.D., reported, " There are degenerative changes particularly at L4-5 on the right as is evident on the earlier study." Frith's alleged injury at DMI occurred a day or two later, August 18 or 19, 2010.

[¶7] After the evidentiary hearing, the administrative law judge (" ALJ" ) affirmed WSI's order denying benefits, finding:

1. On or about August 18, 2010, Frith injured his back while moving a piece of desk furniture at DMI.
2. The greater weight of the evidence showed that Frith had a preexisting lumbar spine condition at the time of the injury.
3. The greater weight of the evidence showed that Frith's symptoms before and after the work injury were substantially similar, indicating no significant change in the underlying degenerative condition.
4. The greater weight of the evidence showed the injury triggered symptoms in the underlying condition, but did not substantially accelerate the progression or substantially worsen the severity of the preexisting condition.

[¶8] The district court affirmed the ALJ's decision.

[¶9] The district court had jurisdiction under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, and N.D.C.C. § § 27-05-06, 65-10-01, and 28-32-42. Frith's appeal was timely under N.D.R.App.P. 4(a) and N.D.C.C. § 28-32-49. This Court has jurisdiction under N.D. Const. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.