Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Chapman v. Hiland Operating, LLC

United States District Court, Eighth Circuit

January 24, 2014

Lenny M. Chapman and Tracy M. Chapman, Plaintiffs,
v.
Hiland Operating, LLC, a Foreign Company, Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC, a Foreign Company, and Hiland Partners LP, a Foreign Partnership, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiff (Hiland Operating, LLC)
v.
Missouri Basin Well Service, Inc., and B&B Heavy Haul, LLC, Third-Party Defendants.

ORDER REQUIRING DISCUSSION OF THE ADVISABILITY OF EARLY SETTLEMENT

CHARLES S. MILLER, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

On January 23, 2014, the court held a telephonic status conference in the above-captioned case. Attorneys Robert P. Schuster and James R. Hoy appeared on plaintiffs' behalf. Attorneys Margaret M. Clarke and Patrick W. Durick appeared on defendants' behalf. Attorneys Gordon H. Hansmeier and Christopher A. Wills appeared on behalf of third-party defendant B&B Heavy Haul, LLC. Attorney Joel A. Flom appeared on behalf of third-party defendant Missouri Basin Well Service, Inc.

Among the issues discussed was the possibility that an early settlement effort could save all parties from having to incur substantial litigation expense in this matter, which, at the end of the day, may have little impact on the final outcome of the case. Among other things, plaintiffs and defendants will each be incurring substantial expenses for attorney's and expert's fees[1] that likely are not recoverable as between plaintiffs and defendants, regardless of who prevails.

The third-party defendants, however, may face an even greater exposure if plaintiffs obtain a judgment against defendants and defendants prevail on the third-party claims. Depending upon the scope of the third-party defendants' alleged contractual obligations, they may be faced with having to pay, in addition to their own attorney's fees and costs, any judgment in favor of plaintiffs (amounts for liability, prejudgment interest, [2] and taxable costs) as well as possible defendants' attorney's fees and costs, including actual expert fees.

Having considered the issue further, the court directs the parties (including the third-party defendants) to discuss with their the clients the advisability of an early settlement conference or mediation and the timing of any such alternative dispute resolution effort. The possibilities include not only the parties attempting to reach a global settlement on all claims, but also one that is limited to settlement of plaintiffs' claims, thereby saving the very expensive discovery and trial costs associated with that part of the litigation.

The parties are directed to consult with their clients with regard to these matters before the February 4, 2014, status conference and to be prepared to discuss the advisability and timing of any ADR effort at that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.