In the Interest of H.D.
H.D., Respondent and Appellant. William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee
This decision appears in the reporter in a table titled 'Supreme Court of North Dakota Affirmances by Summary Opinion', published quarterly by rule. See N.D.R.App.P., Rule 35.1
Appeal fro the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.
Gary E. Euren, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for petitioner and appellee.
Douglas W. Nesheim, Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant.
[¶ 1]H.D. appeals a district court's continuing treatment order and involuntary treatment with medication order. He argues there is insufficient evidence to support the involuntary treatment order and claims there is no clear and convincing evidence showing he requires a higher dosage of medication. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶ 2] GERALD W.
VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, MARY MUEHLEN
MARING, and ...