Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Joseph Cruz Christopher Ramirez Iii

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA


March 15, 2012

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE
v.
JOSEPH CRUZ CHRISTOPHER RAMIREZ III, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

Per curiam.

N.D. Supreme CourtState v. Ramirez,

This opinion is subject to petition for rehearing. [Go to Documents]

[Download as WordPerfect]

2012 ND 51

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Joseph Ramirez appeals from the trial court's judgment revoking his probation and amending his criminal judgment. On appeal, Ramirez argues the evidence does not support the court's findings, and the court abused its discretion when it revoked his probation. Specifically, Ramirez claims two of the alleged violations of probation were not proven by a preponderance of the evidence and the trial court erred by basing the revocation of his probation, at least in part, on these findings. The State need show only a single violation to sustain revocation of probation. State v. Jacobsen, 2008 ND 52, ¶ 15, 746 N.W.2d 405.

[¶2] We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner

20120315

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.