March 15, 2012
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE
JOSEPH CRUZ CHRISTOPHER RAMIREZ III, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
N.D. Supreme CourtState v. Ramirez,
This opinion is subject to petition for rehearing. [Go to Documents]
[Download as WordPerfect]
2012 ND 51
[¶1] Joseph Ramirez appeals from the trial court's judgment revoking his probation and amending his criminal judgment. On appeal, Ramirez argues the evidence does not support the court's findings, and the court abused its discretion when it revoked his probation. Specifically, Ramirez claims two of the alleged violations of probation were not proven by a preponderance of the evidence and the trial court erred by basing the revocation of his probation, at least in part, on these findings. The State need show only a single violation to sustain revocation of probation. State v. Jacobsen, 2008 ND 52, ¶ 15, 746 N.W.2d 405.
[¶2] We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.