Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kristi J. Burgess v. North Dakota Department of Transportation

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA


December 13, 2011

KRISTI J. BURGESS,
PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE
v.
NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, Judge.

Per curiam.

N.D. Supreme Court

Burgess v. N.D. Department of Transportation,

2011 ND 226

This opinion is subject to petition for rehearing. [Go to Documents]

[Download as WordPerfect]

REVERSED.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] The North Dakota Department of Transportation appeals from the district court's judgment reversing the administrative hearing officer's decision to suspend Kristi Burgess's driving privileges for two years.

[¶2] Burgess was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, transported to a medical facility, and submitted to a blood draw that revealed her alcohol concentration exceeded the legal limit. Burgess sought an administrative hearing. She argued the blood test results were inadmissible because her request for an attorney was not granted. The hearing officer concluded the blood test results were admissible and suspended Burgess's driving privileges. Burgess sought judicial review. The district court reversed the hearing officer's decision, concluding the hearing officer failed to make a specific finding as to whether Burgess requested an attorney after her arrest. The Department appealed, arguing the blood test results were admissible in the administrative hearing because the exclusionary rule does not apply to civil proceedings and, therefore, the district court erred in reversing the hearing officer's decision. We agree. Our decision in Holte v. State Highway Comm'r, 436 N.W.2d 250 (N.D. 1989) is dispositive of this issue. In Holte, we held constitutional protections available in criminal matters are not necessarily applicable in administrative proceedings, and we "refus[ed] to extend the exclusionary rule to civil proceedings." Id. at 252. We, therefore, summarily reverse the district court under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b) and reinstate the license suspension.

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner

20111213

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.