September 15, 2011
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA,
PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE
SPENCER CURTISS, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
N.D. Supreme Court
State v. Curtiss,
2011 ND 175
This opinion is subject to petition for rehearing. [Go to Documents]
[Download as WordPerfect]
[¶1] Spencer Curtiss appeals the district court's criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of gross sexual imposition. Curtiss argues the district court erred by admitting a video of Curtiss smoking marijuana, admitting testimony about Curtiss channeling a younger personality while he engaged in sexual acts with the victim and excluding evidence of the victim's sexual history. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion by making the evidentiary rulings.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Mary Muehlen Maring Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.