January 12, 2011
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE
DANIEL SCOTT PELZL, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT
Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard W. Grosz, Judge.
N.D. Supreme CourtState v. Pelzl,
2011 ND 3
This opinion is subject to petition for rehearing. [Go to Documents] [Download as WordPerfect]
AFFIRMED. Per Curiam.
[¶1] Daniel Pelzl appeals from the trial court's amended judgment revoking his probation. On appeal, Pelzl argues the trial court erred in revoking his probation because the probationary conditions set by the court were unrealistic. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4) and (7). See, e.g., State v. McAvoy, 2007 ND 178, ¶¶ 9, 18, 741 N.W.2d 198 (holding the trial court's factual findings of a probation violation were not clearly erroneous and concluding the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant's probation).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.