Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re D.V.A.

October 19, 2010

IN THE INTEREST OF D.V.A.
CYNTHIA M. FELAND, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE
v.
D.V.A., RESPONDENT AND APPELLANT



Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

Per curiam.

AFFIRMED.

[¶1] D.V.A. appeals from a district court order continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. See In the Matter of D.V.A., 2009 ND 75, 764 N.W.2d 417; In the Interest of D.V.A., 2004 ND 57, 676 N.W.2d 776. He argues the district court's order violated his right to the least restrictive available treatment program or facility under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-13 and the court erred when it failed to consider any least restrictive treatment programs for him. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7) and In the Interest of P.F., 2008 ND 37, 744 N.W.2d 724.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

20101019

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.