Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline v. Factory Mutual Insurance Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION


July 19, 2010

WILLISTON BASIN INTERSTATE PIPELINE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FACTORY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Charles S. Miller, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On July 15, 2010, defendant filed a Motion to Strike Exhibits 6 and 9 to its Brief in Support of its Motion to Compel. It explains that Exhibits 6 and 9, which had been designated "confidential" pursuant to the parties' stipulated protective order, were inadvertently filed publicly. It requests that these exhibits be stricken from the record, adding that they intend to refile these exhibits under seal.

Defendant also filed a Motion to Supplement the Record. Therein it seeks leave of court to supplement Exhibits 5 and 10 to the affidavit of defense counsel filed in support of defendant's letter brief in support of its Motion to Compel.

Exhibits 6 and 9 need not be refiled as they may be sealed by the Clerk's office. Accordingly, the court deems to the Motion to Strike (Docket No. 46) MOOT and directs the Clerk's office to seal Exhibits 6 and 9 to the brief filed by defendant in support of its Motion to Compel. The court further GRANTS defendant's motion to supplement its Motion to Compel (Docket No. 48).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100719

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.