Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Moore

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA


December 21, 2009

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE
v.
JONATHAN RAY MOORE, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail H. Hagerty, Judge.

Per curiam.

AFFIRMED.

[¶1] Jonathan Moore appeals the order setting restitution and the amended criminal judgment. Moore argues the district court erred when it ordered him to pay restitution because restitution can only be imposed after considering its rehabilitative affect and his classification as a habitual offender represents the State's acknowledgment that he cannot be rehabilitated. Moore also argues the evidence does not support the amount of restitution ordered by the district court. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining restitution should be ordered or in determining the amount of restitution. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Wade L. Webb, D.J.

[¶3] The Honorable Wade L. Webb, D.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.

20091221

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.