Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McCarthy v. Astrue

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWEASTERN DIVISION


March 31, 2009

DANIEL J. MCCARTHY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge United States District Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The plaintiff, Daniel J. McCarthy, filed a complaint on October 31, 2007, seeking judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433. See Docket No. 1. The parties filed their respective motions for summary judgment on May 30, 2008, and July 2, 2008. See Docket Nos. 6 and 10. Magistrate Judge Karen K. Klein conducted a review of the record and relevant case law and issued a Report and Recommendation on March 11, 2009. See Docket No. 16. Judge Klein recommended that the defendant's motion for summary judgment be denied and that McCarthy's motion for summary judgment be granted in part, and that the matter be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The parties were given ten (10) days to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation. No objections were filed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, relevant case law, and the entire record, and finds the Report and Recommendation to be persuasive. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 16) in its entirety. The Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 6) is GRANTED in part and the Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED (Docket No. 10). The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for issuance of the requested subpoenas and order for an additional consultive medical exam, as well as rehearing before a different ALJ.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090331

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.