Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Baker v. Astrue

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION


March 4, 2009

DANA E. BAKER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Ralph R. Erickson, District Judge United States District Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Dana E. Baker, sought judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for disability insurance benefits. The Court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied (Doc. #11). No party has filed an objection to the recommendation within the requisite time period. Local Rule 72.1(E)(4).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, along with the entire file, and finds that the Magistrate Judge's position is correct. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. For the reasons set forth therein, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED (doc. #7) and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED (doc. #6).

IT IS SO ORDERED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

20090304

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.