Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pletsch v. Astrue

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION


February 27, 2009

ELAINE V. PLETSCH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge United States District Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The plaintiff, Elaine V. Pletsch, filed a complaint on February 21, 2008, seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration Commissioner's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433. See Docket No. 1. Pletsch filed a motion for summary judgment on June 23, 2008. See Docket No. 7. The defendant, the Social Security Administration Commissioner, filed a motion for summary judgment on July 21, 2008. See Docket No. 14. Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. conducted a review of the record and relevant case law and issued a Report and Recommendation on February 6, 2009. See Docket No. 18. Judge Miller recommended that the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment be denied; that Pletsch's motion for summary judgment be granted in part; that the decisions of the Commissioner be reversed; and that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. The parties were given ten (10) days to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections were filed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, relevant case law, and the entire record, and finds the Report and Recommendation to be persuasive. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 18) in its entirety. The Commissioner's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 14) is DENIED and Pletsch's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART (Docket No. 7). The decisions of the Commissioner are REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090227

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.